The health census says which space a broken type is in, instead of only how many

A portal publishes a short census of its own health on a page anyone can read. One line of it reports the types the portal builds for itself: how many there are, how many are ready, and how many are in a state that needs attention — including the one state nothing else in the platform will ever mention again.

That state is a type that was already broken before this version of the portal shipped. Deploys deliberately do not stop for it: one abandoned type must not be able to freeze every future release, discovered at the worst possible moment. The consequence of that — correct — trade is that the census line is the only place in the entire system where such a type is recorded at all.

And it recorded a number. previouslybroken=1. Exactly one, somewhere, on that portal — and not which one. Everything else that could have answered is scoped to what the person asking is allowed to see, and the broken type was in a space they were not; each probe answered "I can't tell", for its own reason, and none of them answered "no". One report was filed, closed as fixed on that ambiguity, re-filed unchanged four weeks later, and bulk-closed a third time without anything being read.

The census now names the space. The same line continues:

Non-baked types by partition: previouslybroken in BinaryClickerV2/…

That is enough to route the finding to whoever owns that space, which is all any of those three reports ever needed. It applies to every outstanding state, not just the broken one — a portal reporting fifty-eight types still to build now says which spaces they are in, where before nobody could enumerate them.

The type's own name is deliberately not published. This page needs no login, so it names the space and stops there. A space name is already visible to anyone who can list them; a node's title is not, and an instrument that works by disclosing other people's titles is a disclosure in an instrument's clothing. Whether an authenticated view should say more is a separate decision for whoever owns that page — the information now reaches it either way.